The Hoot - 16 February 2013
African victims don’t move Indian media
Violence against Africans in India is not reported as intensively as attacks on Indians in Australia. SPUTNIK KILAMBI says the media should rise above society’s biases.
On December 3 last year, five men robbed and gangraped a 24-year-old Rwandese woman as she was returning one evening to her home near Delhi University. The story was reported, though not widely, like so many others that have come before. And it was soon forgotten. Then came yet another gangrape and this time the story gripped the nation. India was shaken to its core as details emerged of how a young medical student was repeatedly raped and mutilated by a gang of drunken youths in the heart of the nation’s capital.
Protests erupted on the streets of major cities with women and youth in the forefront, forcing the country to finally examine the shameful way it treats its women. The media blitz that followed was in sharp contrast to the silence or news-in-brief attitude to the thousands of other rapes that have happened and keep happening to women somehow not considered ‘daughters of the nation’.
A similar hands-off attitude can be detected in mainstream media coverage – or, to be accurate, the lack of it – of a worrying number of cases of discrimination and violence against African students in the country.
The muted coverage of the gangrape of the young Rwandese woman, who was ironically seeking asylum in India, is evidence of this selective approach to what is perceived as unacceptable. The Delhi police registered the crime three days after the rape and robbery and this only under pressure from the NGO which came to the help of the 24-year-old woman. It turns out that one of the rapists is well connected. Whether this is linked to the delayed police response is unclear. In a bizarre twist, the car used to abduct the Rwandese woman was reportedly a wedding present from the father-in-law of one of the rapists. An enquiry was ordered, four of the five rapists were arrested, and a police inspector was suspended.
End of story, it would seem – no deep soul-searching, no follow-up, and not even a mention of the case during the endless debates that followed the Delhi gangrape, which occurred after the sexual assault on the Rwandese student.
While a reluctant Delhi police force had to be egged on to investigate the rape of the Rwandese student, it took the Jalandhar police no time at all to arrest three male Rwandese students on ‘eve-teasing’ charges after an incident the Rwandese High Commission said was a misunderstanding. The students said they were asking for directions in a market, but the woman to whom they turned was frightened.
The fear, like the misunderstanding, was probably genuine. Most women are doubly cautious since the Delhi gangrape, but it would be interesting to know how much the wariness of the woman in the market was heightened by the skin colour of the men who approached her. The students have since been released on bail after an intervention by the Rwandese High Commission, which has now warned its citizens to be extremely cautious in their interactions with local people and especially to avoid friendships with the opposite sex because of Indian ‘attitudes’. So much for foreign studies being an opportunity to broaden one’s outlook and make new friends!
When the beheaded body of Imran Mtui, a young IT student from Tanzania, was found near the railway tracks in Bengaluru in 2010, the coverage and investigation was sketchy and a racist motive dismissed out of hand. The case didn’t make national news despite vigorous protests from the victim’s family and the Indian High Commission in Dar-es-Salaam demanding a proper investigation into the murder. Local newspapers merely repeated the police line that the death was accidental. The fact that three other Tanzanian students had died in Bengaluru in the three months prior to Imran’s murder could have at the very least prompted closer scrutiny. Needless to say, Imran’s family is still bitter about their experience of ‘Incredible India’.
The latest horror story concerning African students made headlines briefly in January when 24-year-old Burundian student Yannick Nihangaza emerged from a nine-month coma after being savagely attacked by a gang of Punjabi youth in Jalandhar. Yannick was an IT student at the incongruously named Lovely University, which incidentally has one of the biggest foreign student intakes in the country. A passing autorickshaw driver took the unconscious Yannick to hospital, where he remained on life support for weeks. Despite numerous complaints from his friends and family, and even two letters from Yannick’s father to the Punjab chief minister, there was no action from either the police or the state machinery until the national media took up the story three months later.
The self-congratulatory tone taken by the media about its role in forcing the Punjab government to finally do something about Yannick Nihangaza, who will probably never live a normal life again, is somewhat hypocritical, given the length of time they took to report the attack in the first place.
There were ingredients enough to make it more than just a ‘news’ story – a foreign student has his head smashed in with a boulder and remains suspended between life and death for weeks on end, no action gets taken, he comes from a country whose 13-year-civil war claimed more than 300,000 lives, and there are the familiar Indian elements of feudal and financial power. Why did a desperate father have to go looking for the media instead of the other way around, as would have been the case had the victim been considered more worthy of attention?
The flurry of reports that followed Nestor Nihangaza’s appeal to the media last July subsided as abruptly as they appeared, until his son opened his eyes for the first time since the attack.
Reporting on the day Yannick emerged from his coma, NDTV called it a story of a miracle and of compassion. It was indeed a miracle, but the only real compassion came from some of the staff and students at Lovely University, who raised Rs 6 lakh to cover part of his medical treatment.
Nestor Nihangaza says the report he was shown by the Punjab police showed that his son was clearly targeted because of the colour of his skin (the attackers were quoted as saying they wanted to ‘punish the Black’). The state government had to be pressured into paying compensation and picking up the medical bills. Nestor also complained that Lovely University authorities had not been forthcoming when he approached them for help.
Students from the North-east can empathise with Africans in this country – they too are stigmatised because they look different and are vulnerable to verbal, physical and sexual attack, attacks that get as little media attention as those against blacks.
Of the estimated 50,000 foreign students that swell the coffers of private and public educational institutions, the majority are from neighbouring countries and Africa and the Indian government has announced a further 22,000 scholarships for Africa in the coming three years.
However, the few reporters who have ventured into their world show that African students face similar problems wherever they might be in India
[. . .]
FULL TEXT AT: http://thehoot.org/web/African-victims-don-t-move-Indian-media/6615-1-1-1-true.html