Subscribe to South Asia Citizens Wire | feeds from sacw.net | @sacw
Home > General > Sri Lanka: An appeal to the Tamil Community and its civil and political (...)

Sri Lanka: An appeal to the Tamil Community and its civil and political representatives

6 January 2012

print version of this article print version

The Island, Colombo, 6 January 2012

5 January 2012

Since the end of the war in May 2009, it has become important for all ethnic communities of Sri Lanka to re-examine and re-evaluate their past. It is through this process of self-reflection that some of the major issues that confront state and civil society today can be meaningfully reconceived and reconfigured for the future.

While the war has drawn to a decisive close, the ethnic conflict is far from over and demands solutions short- and long-term. The quest for a viable political solution from a majoritarian state is a primary concern for the Tamil community today.

Continued insecurity in the face of militarisation is an urgent matter. Armed militancy and a political culture of violence have further eroded into the democratic fabric of society. Resettlement and rehabilitation remain unresolved problems. Distribution of land, access to state and social networks, language parity, devolution of power, inter-ethnic reconciliation and the continued presence of gender, class and caste stratifications are a part of the political landscape today.

It is in this regard we raise the question of the eviction of the Northern Muslims 21 years ago. In October 1990, the LTTE evicted roughly 80,000 Muslims from the north in the wake of increasing hostilities and armed conflict in the north and east. The LTTE, which was militarily dominant in the north at that time and controlled large swathes of territory, ordered an entire community to leave the province in two days. In the Jaffna peninsula they were given just two hours’ notice. Subsequent to the eviction, several attempts were made by institutional mechanisms to facilitate the return of the communities to their original lands. During the Ceasefire Agreement (CFA), there were renewed attempts, particularly through the Secretariat for Immediate Humanitarian and Rehabilitation Needs (SIHRN), to negotiate the return of the Muslims with the Sri Lankan state and the LTTE.

In the current political landscape, the eviction of Muslims from the north and their return and resettlement pose a distinct political challenge to civil and political societies of the Tamil community. While from the time of the CFA, Muslims had been trickling back to their homelands in the north, the conditions for their return had not been congenial. Those who have returned have received hardly any state support for resettlement, and have been met with a certain level of bureaucratic hostility. The erasure of Muslim culture and institutions in the north in the last twenty years has made return less acceptable to the host community, and especially fraught for the returnees.

While recognising that the Tamil community has been under intense stress during and after the war, it is important to remember the plight of the forcibly evicted Muslim community in the north who were subjected to similar privations. The Tamil community’s sufferings and hardship cannot become reasons to sideline the issue of Muslim eviction. As much as we struggle for our survival in the face of external and internal pressures, it is paramount that we re-examine the politics of our own actions, assertions and silences.

The eviction represents one of the worst instances of the narrow, exclusivist thrust of the Tamil nationalist political campaign of the past thirty years. The failure of our civil and political leadership to understand and acknowledge this has prevented us from dealing with our own past, and with our own moral and political responsibility towards minority communities that live amidst us. An examination of how we have contributed to the polarisation of relations between our two communities has not been forthcoming even after the end of the thirty-year war.

We must realise at least now that there is no exclusive political solution for the Tamil community, and that the question of political power sharing and equal rights confronts all minority communities. Inter-ethnic reconciliation and dialogue between communities, in particular the Muslim and Tamil communities, are essential processes to arrive at a sustainable political solution. The document The Quest for Redemption: the Story of the Northern Muslims, prepared by the Citizens’ Commission on the expulsion of Muslims by the LTTE recently made a most damning pronouncement about the silence of the Tamil community on the eviction. We need to break through this silence if we are to move toward a genuine process of reconciliation.

Today, as we are compelled to forge new paths of activism for our own survival, we need to formulate responses that are borne out of dialogue with different communities. This is essential if we are seeking a just and democratic political solution. As a step toward this, there has to be a public disavowal of the eviction. We shall wholeheartedly say that never again will such a heinous act as the eviction take place amidst us. Never again shall we condone such acts of ethnic cleansing. Importantly, it is necessary for us as a community, while revisiting this event and its continuing legacy, to set up an inter-ethnic mechanism to bring about dialogue and facilitate an easy return and resettlement process of the Muslims in the north.

Tamil society can no longer be isolationist and act on its own without paying heed to the concerns of other communities. We shall engage in questions of marginalisation, discrimination and injustice touching upon any community. And we shall unreservedly pledge our support to promote the pluralist character of society at all levels in our midst, and embrace a politics of inclusivity in the interests of democracy, justice and equality.

Signatories:

  1. Ms. Jovita Arulanantham
  2. Ms. Kundhavi Balachandran
  3. Mr. Sivakolunthu Buvanakumar
  4. Dr. Godwin Constantine
  5. Dr. Kumar David
  6. Mr. R. Devarajan
  7. Ms. Cayathri Divakalala
  8. Dr. S. Ganesan
  9. Mr. Shaseevan Ganeshananthan
  10. Mr. P. B. Gowthaman
  11. Dr. Rajan Hoole
  12. Ms. Sithiravel Ithaiyarani
  13. Mr. T. Antony Jeganathan
  14. Ms. Vasuki Jayasankar
  15. Dr. T. Jayasingam 1
  16. Mr. D.B.S. Jeyaraj
  17. Mr. Ahilan Kadirgamar
  18. Mr. Silan Kadirgamar
  19. Ms. Niyanthini Kadirgamar
  20. Ms. Sarvam Kailasapathy
  21. Ms. Dushiyanthini Kanagasabapathipillai
  22. Dr. S.V. Kasynathan
  23. Mr. Thirukovil Kaviyuvan
  24. Mr. Sathy Kulasingam
  25. Mr. Prithiviraj Kulasingham
  26. Prof. Vijaya Kumar
  27. Ms. Maha Luxmy Kurushanthan
  28. Mr. K.C. Logeswaran
  29. Mr. S. Manisegaran
  30. Mr. Chandrasekaran Manimaran
  31. Mr. P. Muthulingam
  32. Mr. V. Nandakumar
  33. Ms. Malini Paramaguru
  34. Ms. Nirmala Rajasingam
  35. Ms. Vasuki Rajasingam
  36. Mr. Sanjayan Rajasingham
  37. Mr. C.Rajeshkumar
  38. Ms. A. Renu
  39. Ms. Kumudini Samuel
  40. Ms. Rani Samuel
  41. Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu
  42. Dr. Muthukrishna Sarvananthan
  43. Ms. Ambika Satkunanathan
  44. Mr. Shyam Selvadurai
  45. Rev. Jothini Seenithamby
  46. Dr. T. Shanaathanan
  47. Ms. M. Mangaleswary Shanker
  48. Ms. C. Shanthini
  49. Mr. Shobashakthi
  50. Mr. P.N. Singham
  51. Ms. Vasuki Sivakumar
  52. Mr. K.S. Sivakumaran
  53. Dr. Sumathy Sivamohan
  54. Mr. Subramaniam Sivathasan
  55. Mr. Balasingam Skanthakumar
  56. Mr. M. Sooriyasekaram
  57. Dr. K. Sritharan
  58. Rev. M. Jude Sutharshan
  59. Mr. H.D. Thampoe
  60. Ms. Priya Thangarajah
  61. Mr. Kandiah Thanikasalam
  62. Mr. R. Thevamaran
  63. Prof. S. Thillainathan
  64. Dr. Sharika Thiranagama
  65. Mr. M. Thiruvarangan
  66. Mr. Uma Varatharajan
  67. Mr. Godfrey Yogarajah
  68. Mr. Ronnie Yogarajah

[...]

P.S.

The above article from The Island is reproduced here for educational and non commercial use.