Subscribe to South Asia Citizens Wire | feeds from | @sacw

People for peace

by Beena Sarwar, 29 December 2011

print version of this article print version

The News, December 26, 2011

The Indian government’s clearance of visas for 237 Pakistanis to attend a major peace convention in Allahabad from Dec 29 to Jan 1 is a welcome step, allowing the much-delayed Eighth Joint Convention of the Pakistan-India Peoples for Peace and Democracy (PIPFPD) to finally be held.

PIPFPD is the largest people-to-people organisation between the two countries, formed in 1994 by eminent intellectuals, academics and activists from both sides. Discussions at the joint conventions revolve around issues ranging from “war, demilitarisation, peace and peace dividends,” to “democratic solution to Kashmir problem,” “democratic governance” and “religious intolerance in India and Pakistan.” “Globalisation and regional cooperation” was added at the Fifth Joint Convention in 2000 at Bangalore.

The principles laid out in the initial PIPFPD Declaration of 1994 are even more relevant today than they were then: that the “politics of confrontation between India and Pakistan has failed to achieve benefits of any kind for the people” of the two countries, and that the respective governments should honour the wishes of their people who “increasingly want genuine peace and friendship.”

Better relations, said the declaration, “will help in reducing communal and ethnic tension” and “will help the South Asian region to progress economically and socially.” The declaration urged the governments of Pakistan and India to “agree to an unconditional no-war pact immediately” and to recognise that “a democratic solution to the Kashmir dispute is essential.”

Over 200 Pakistani and Indian delegates participated in the groundbreaking First Joint Convention in New Delhi in 1995. For the first time, Indians and Pakistanis sat together to freely discuss the contentious issues of Kashmir, demilitarisation, and the politics of religious intolerance. The PIPFPD’s formulation about Kashmir is now part of public discourse: that Kashmir should not be viewed merely as a territorial dispute between India and Pakistan but as a matter of the lives and aspirations of the Kashmiri people, who must be involved in any discussion about their future.

The seven joint conventions held since, in various cities across the region and alternating between the two countries, have involved hundreds of ordinary citizens. Delegates pay for their own travel expenses, while the hosts arrange inexpensive board and lodging.

Initial delays to the Eighth Joint Convention, which was supposed to be held in Peshawar in 2007, came from Pakistan, after the Seventh Joint Convention in New Delhi in 2005. The political situation provided justifications for the denial of the necessary permission: escalation in the “war on terror,” the lawyers’ movement, the return of Benazir Bhutto and then her tragic assassination, and escalating violence in Pakistan as the new government tried to tackle the militants unambiguously.

When it became clear that trying to hold the convention in Pakistan would result in more delay, the organisers decided to move it to India. That took over a year and much negotiation. Conditions were verbally set out and apprehensions voiced about the possibility of ‘wrong speeches” being made-not just by the Pakistanis but by Indians. However, those raising the objections were unwilling to spell out their apprehensions in writing.

In the end, persistence and people pressure paid off. Several Indo-Pak events have been held over the past two years, including by Aman ki Asha. Many were initiated by Indians, contrary to the perception that “Indians don’t care about peace with Pakistan.”

Significantly, some of the most inspiring initiatives have come from Mumbai, a city still reeling from the horrific attacks of Nov 26-28, 2008, for which many Indians squarely blame Pakistan. However, many other Indians, including Mumbaikars themselves, argue that all Pakistanis should not be held responsible for the actions of a few.

An extraordinary expression of this spirit was the 50-kilometre-long “human chain for peace” formed by some 60,000 Mumbaikars on Dec 12, 2008, urging the government of India to show restraint in dealing with Pakistan – just days after the attacks that claimed 164 lives and left over 300 wounded. This hugely impressive event was overshadowed by the jingoism amplified by the media, but the Indian government did not (for several reasons) pander to those baying for action against Pakistan.

Earlier this year, students from Mumbai came up with a pioneering initiative they called “Ummeed-e-Milaap” (hope for unity), a platform for Indian and Pakistani students to connect, in over 30 colleges in Mumbai, Lahore and Karachi. Last month, a 22-member delegation of journalists from the Press Club of Mumbai travelled to Pakistan to connect with colleagues in Karachi and Hyderabad, which culminated in a joint Declaration of Cooperation.

The world is changing. The old paradigms and policies based on paranoia and hatred must give way to a realisation that it is only with cooperation with each other that India that Pakistan can fulfil their respective potentials. The Seventh Joint Convention articulated some visionary steps that the two governments can take towards this end (see The Allahabad Convention will take forward these demands, foremost among which is easing of the current restrictive visa regime.

We have seen what happens when thousands of cricket fans are given visas to attend matches across the border: deepening of goodwill and a reaffirmation that the people are ready for good relations and personal contacts. As the Allahabad Convention gets under way, do our governments have the political will and vision to follow the people to peace, or will they remain mired in outdated security-state paradigms?

The writer Beena Sarwar is Editor Aman ki Asha.

Email: beena.sarwar at


The above article from The News is reproduced here for educational and non commercial use